physical<\/em> Unified Memory as possible is always the best option.<\/p>\nAll M1-based devices are limited to 16GB \u2014 that\u2019s their maximum.<\/p>\n
M2 ones, however, can go up to 24GB (for an additional $400). If you\u2019re a tremendously<\/em> demanding user, then you really ought to go with the bigger and more powerful 14\u201d or 16\u201d MacBook Pro; those<\/em> laptops can be equipped with up to 96GB of Unified Memory (depending on the SKU and SoC).<\/p>\nYou don\u2019t need that<\/em> much, but 32GB would<\/em> be a good sweet spot.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/span>Are Apple Silicon MacBooks Better for Video Editing Than Windows Laptops?<\/span><\/h2>\nWithout a shadow of a doubt. They\u2019re so much better, in fact, it\u2019s kind of unfair <\/em>\u2014 what with them drawing so little power and being near silent (or literally<\/em> silent) no matter which codec or resolution you happen to throw their way.<\/p>\nAnd that\u2019s not only due to their advanced architecture but also the fact that they come imbued with a dedicated Media Engine \u2014 a spectacular addition that has made video encoding and decoding a breeze<\/em>.<\/p>\nNow, make no mistake: powerful Windows-based laptops can<\/em> compete on even footing, but they\u2019re simply not as optimized nor can they handle demanding footage as easily. <\/strong><\/p>\nThey\u2019re a great pick overall, but they still have a few too many weaknesses and quirks when it comes to video editing \u2014 namely their battery life and the fact that they drop in performance whenever they\u2019re unplugged from a wall outlet.<\/p>\n
They are<\/em> the better choice if you tend to work with a lot of effects, though, as most models have a lot<\/em> more GPU horsepower when compared to the M1 and M2 chipsets.<\/strong><\/p>\nAnd, frankly, it\u2019s not even a competitive fight. Other than that, though, an ARM-based MacBook will deliver a much<\/em> more enjoyable video editing experience.<\/p>\n<\/span>Are Intel MacBooks Good for Video Editing?<\/span><\/h2>\nIntel-based MacBooks might<\/em> be able to get the job done if you\u2019re not working with demanding codecs and resolutions, but they should by no means be atop your list of priorities.<\/p>\nThey run way too hot and loud and are, quite frankly, laughably bad at video editing when compared to even the most \u201cbasic\u201d Apple Silicon MacBooks \u2014 the ones which have taken the world by storm.<\/p>\n
<\/span>Conclusion<\/span><\/h2>\nApple Silicon MacBooks are incredibly powerful and yet astoundingly efficient. That\u2019s\u2026 a combination seldom seen.<\/p>\n
They\u2019re a stellar choice for video editing as they not only have a built-in Media Engine for video decoding and encoding but also due to the fact that all of today\u2019s most popular NLEs have been optimized to run on Apple Silicon hardware.<\/p>\n
Final Cut Pro, Adobe Premiere Pro, and DaVinci Resolve all run extraordinarily<\/em> well on both the M1 and M2 (to say nothing of their more powerful Pro, Max, and Ultra variants), which makes these MacBooks an incredible choice for video editors \u2014 and creatives in general.<\/p>\nThey\u2019re not that<\/em> great a choice if you\u2019re working with many different GPU-heavy effects, though, as both the M1 and M2 are lacking in the GPU department. They\u2019re really not particularly impressive in that regard. They\u2019re better than expected, sure, but it\u2019s still a bottleneck of sorts.<\/p>\nThe M1\/M2 Pro, Max, and Ultra chipsets were designed with those people \u2014 the consummate professionals \u2014 in mind.<\/p>\n
For those who don\u2019t need an exceptional amount of GPU power, however, the M1 and M2 are still a spectacular choice.<\/p>\n
They\u2019ll chew through your edits with staggering ease, all the while drawing less power than competing Windows laptops, and omitting a negligible amount of fan noise \u2014 if any at all.<\/p>\n
<\/span>FAQ<\/span><\/h2>\nLet\u2019s go over a few potential questions you might have regarding this particular topic:<\/p>\n
<\/span>Are Apple Silicon MacBooks Good for Video Editing?<\/span><\/h3>\nThey\u2019re not only good<\/em> but rather incredible<\/em>. These ARM-based chipsets are a veritable revolution, and the fact that millions of people have made the switch within a moment\u2019s notice speaks volumes<\/em>.<\/p>\nThey also have dedicated Media Engines for video encoding and decoding which allows them to punch way<\/em> above their weight class when it comes to video editing \u2014 they can cut through HEVC footage as if it were the easiest thing in the world.<\/p>\nThey\u2019re not a particularly stellar choice if you\u2019re working with many different GPU-heavy effects, though.<\/strong> If that\u2019s<\/em> the case, you really ought to go with one of Apple\u2019s more powerful Pro machines (14\u201d\/16\u201d).<\/p>\n