{"id":22642,"date":"2023-05-26T15:03:17","date_gmt":"2023-05-26T13:03:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/g100.us\/?p=22642"},"modified":"2023-05-27T12:13:15","modified_gmt":"2023-05-27T10:13:15","slug":"amd-radeon-pro-w7900-w7800-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/g100.us\/amd-radeon-pro-w7900-w7800-review\/","title":{"rendered":"AMD Radeon Pro W7900, W7800 Review - The Most Important Workstation GPU Launch in Years?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_39 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\">TABLE OF CONTENTS<\/p>\n<label for=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-66844deb5947d\" class=\"cssicon\"><span style=\"display: flex;align-items: center;width: 35px;height: 30px;justify-content: center;direction:ltr;\"><svg style=\"fill: #7f11e0;color:#7f11e0\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\" \/><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #7f11e0;color:#7f11e0\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\" \/><\/svg><\/span><\/label><label for=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-66844deb5947d\" class=\"cssiconcheckbox\">1<\/label><input type=\"checkbox\" id=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-66844deb5947d\" checked><nav><ul class=\"ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 \"><li class=\"ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2\"><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/amd-radeon-pro-w7900-w7800-review\/#Introducing_the_AMD_Radeon_PRO_W7900_and_W7800_RDNA3_for_Workstations\" title=\"Introducing the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and W7800: RDNA3 for Workstations\">Introducing the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and W7800: RDNA3 for Workstations<\/a><\/li><li class=\"ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2\"><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/amd-radeon-pro-w7900-w7800-review\/#AMDs_HIP_Move_Translating_CUDA_to_HIP\" title=\"AMD\u2019s HIP Move: Translating CUDA to HIP\">AMD\u2019s HIP Move: Translating CUDA to HIP<\/a><ul class=\"ez-toc-list-level-3\"><li class=\"ez-toc-heading-level-3\"><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/amd-radeon-pro-w7900-w7800-review\/#Radeon_Support_for_Redshift_is_Finally_Here\" title=\"Radeon Support for Redshift is Finally Here!\">Radeon Support for Redshift is Finally Here!<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class=\"ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2\"><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/amd-radeon-pro-w7900-w7800-review\/#Radeon_PRO_W7900_W7800_Redshift_Benchmarks_Whats_the_Verdict\" title=\"Radeon PRO W7900 &amp; W7800 Redshift Benchmarks: What\u2019s the Verdict?\">Radeon PRO W7900 &amp; W7800 Redshift Benchmarks: What\u2019s the Verdict?<\/a><\/li><li class=\"ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2\"><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/amd-radeon-pro-w7900-w7800-review\/#Radeon_Blender_GPU_Benchmark_OptiX_vs_HIP\" title=\"Radeon Blender GPU Benchmark: OptiX vs. HIP\">Radeon Blender GPU Benchmark: OptiX vs. HIP<\/a><\/li><li class=\"ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2\"><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/amd-radeon-pro-w7900-w7800-review\/#Radeon_Pro_Adobe_After_Effects_and_Premiere_Pro_Benchmarks\" title=\"Radeon Pro Adobe After Effects and Premiere Pro Benchmarks\">Radeon Pro Adobe After Effects and Premiere Pro Benchmarks<\/a><\/li><li class=\"ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2\"><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/amd-radeon-pro-w7900-w7800-review\/#Time_to_Seriously_Consider_AMD_Radeon_for_Workstations\" title=\"Time to Seriously Consider AMD Radeon for Workstations?\">Time to Seriously Consider AMD Radeon for Workstations?<\/a><ul class=\"ez-toc-list-level-3\"><li class=\"ez-toc-heading-level-3\"><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/amd-radeon-pro-w7900-w7800-review\/#Verdict\" title=\"Verdict?\">Verdict?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<p>Every GPU review we\u2019ve done over the past few years for workstation use has always been accompanied by a sickening sidenote \u2013 NVIDIA offers better support for Pro apps. Well, is this finally the one where we, for once, DON\u2019T have to say it?<\/p>\n<p>I certainly hope so.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Introducing_the_AMD_Radeon_PRO_W7900_and_W7800_RDNA3_for_Workstations\"><\/span>Introducing the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and W7800: RDNA3 for Workstations<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>The Radeon Pro W7900 and the W7800 feature AMD\u2019s chiplet design that lets them combine different manufacturing processes into a single chip (this generation uses an older 6nm process for the MCD or Memory Cache Die and a 5nm process for the GCD or Graphics Compute Die).<\/p>\n<p><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22663\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091101.jpg\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"903\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091101.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091101-300x212.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091101-1024x722.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091101-768x542.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"><\/noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22663 lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%20903%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"903\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%20903%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091101.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091101-300x212.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091101-1024x722.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091101-768x542.jpg 768w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091101.jpg\"><\/p>\n<h4>Radeon PRO W7900 and W7800 Hardware Specifications<\/h4>\n<p>From a specifications POV, the Radeon Pro W7900 is the workstation equivalent of a mainstream Radeon RX 7900XTX with lower clocks. The Radeon Pro W7800, on the other hand, is probably what the Radeon RX 7800 would have looked like, had AMD released something right below the Radeon RX 7900XT.<\/p>\n<p>Here are the key specs and pricing for AMD\u2019s Radeon PRO workstation graphics cards:<\/p>\n\n<table id=\"tablepress-198\" class=\"tablepress tablepress-id-198 tablepress-responsive\">\n<thead>\n<tr class=\"row-1 odd\">\n\t<th class=\"column-1\"> <\/th><th class=\"column-2\">Radeon Pro W7900<\/th><th class=\"column-3\">Radeon Pro W7800<\/th><th class=\"column-4\">Radeon RX 7900XTX<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody class=\"row-hover\">\n<tr class=\"row-2 even\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">GPU Architecture<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">RDNA 3<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">RDNA 3<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">RDNA 3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-3 odd\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Compute Units<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">96<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">70<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">96<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-4 even\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">TGP<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">295W<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">260W<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">355W<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-5 odd\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Peak FP32 Performance<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">61.3 TFLOPs<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">45.2 TFLOPs<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">61 TFLOPs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-6 even\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Peak FP16 Performance<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">122.64 TFLOPs<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">90.5 TFLOPs<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">123 TFLOPs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-7 odd\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">VRAM Capacity<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">48GB GDDR6<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">32GB GDDR6<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">24GB GDDR6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-8 even\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Memory Bus<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">384-bit<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">256-bit<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">384-bit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr class=\"row-9 odd\">\n\t<td class=\"column-1\">Price (USD)<\/td><td class=\"column-2\">$3,999<\/td><td class=\"column-3\">$2,499<\/td><td class=\"column-4\">$999<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<!-- #tablepress-198 from cache -->\n<p>Since the Radeon PRO W7900 is basically an RX 7900XTX, we should see the performance in most apps line up evenly.<\/p>\n<p>Now, let\u2019s pit these new workstation graphics cards not just against each other, but also against their mainstream Radeon and NVIDIA counterparts and other workstation options on the market.<\/p>\n<p><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22657\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090819.jpg\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"1032\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090819.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090819-300x242.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090819-1024x826.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090819-768x619.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"><\/noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22657 lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%201032%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"1032\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%201032%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090819.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090819-300x242.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090819-1024x826.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090819-768x619.jpg 768w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090819.jpg\"><\/p>\n<p>Before we dive into the Radeon PRO W7900 and W7800 Workstation Graphics cards from AMD, it\u2019s important to understand what AMD is bringing to the table, and how this differs from its previous attempts to be relevant in the workstation market.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"AMDs_HIP_Move_Translating_CUDA_to_HIP\"><\/span>AMD\u2019s HIP Move: Translating CUDA to HIP<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>So, why are we so excited about this launch?<\/p>\n<p>One word \u2013 competition.<\/p>\n<p>For far too long, NVIDIA has maintained a deathgrip on the professional market. Although this wasn\u2019t a problem initially, and still isn\u2019t to a certain degree, things have been slowly deteriorating.<\/p>\n<p>From outright banning blower-style GPUs for their mainstream line that could actually be used in a render node to offering almost no price-to-performance gains in successive generations, NVIDIA has become a bit too comfortable in a world where CUDA has been king and there\u2019s no real competition. But now, it looks like AMD has equipped developers with the right tools to finally drive that competition.<\/p>\n<p><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22658\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090651.jpg\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"470\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090651.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090651-300x110.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090651-1024x376.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090651-768x282.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"><\/noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22658 lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%20470%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"470\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%20470%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090651.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090651-300x110.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090651-1024x376.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090651-768x282.jpg 768w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090651.jpg\"><\/p>\n<p>AMD set the foundation to compete with CUDA many years ago when they announced AMD ROCm and HIP way back in 2016. I wouldn\u2019t be surprised if you haven\u2019t heard of HIP or even ROCm. These aspects of Radeon\u2019s efforts have generally flown under the mainstream radar.<\/p>\n<p>HIP, or Heterogenous-Compute Interface for Portability (a mouthful, isn\u2019t it?), is an integral part of AMD\u2019s Radeon Open Compute Platform, or ROCm.<\/p>\n<p>Even in 2016, the AMD HIP compiler was positioned as a solution for developers to maintain a single code base while developing for multiple platforms. So, in theory, this allowed developers to support both AMD and NVIDIA GPUs (CUDA) without sinking significant developer time into the effort. Here\u2019s a slide from that announcement (Nov 2016):<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_22650\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><noscript><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-22650\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-22650\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/screenshot_56.jpeg\" alt=\"AMD ROCm Announcement Press Deck (TechPowerUp)\" width=\"800\" height=\"444\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/screenshot_56.jpeg 800w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/screenshot_56-300x167.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/screenshot_56-768x426.jpeg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\"><\/noscript><img aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-22650\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-22650 lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%20800%20444%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"AMD ROCm Announcement Press Deck (TechPowerUp)\" width=\"800\" height=\"444\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%20800%20444%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 800w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/screenshot_56.jpeg 800w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/screenshot_56-300x167.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/screenshot_56-768x426.jpeg 768w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/screenshot_56.jpeg\"><p id=\"caption-attachment-22650\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.techpowerup.com\/227811\/amd-announces-rocm-initiative-high-performance-computing-open-standards\" target=\"_blank\">AMD ROCm Announcement Press Deck (TechPowerUp)<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<p>While this might have encouraged newer developers to consider Radeon GPUs in their product roadmaps, older players had no such option.<\/p>\n<p>Many existing apps that have become the foundation for professional workloads sit on a mountain of CUDA codebases \u2013 eliminating the possibility of any Radeon support. One such example is (now MAXON\u2019s) Redshift GPU render engine.<\/p>\n<p>For years, it has enjoyed the limelight as the GPU render engine of choice for serious professionals, and for all those years, it has only supported NVIDIA GPUs. Well, AMD finally has an answer in the form of HIPify.<\/p>\n<p><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22659\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091306.jpg\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"710\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091306.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091306-300x166.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091306-1024x568.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091306-768x426.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"><\/noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22659 lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%20710%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"710\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%20710%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091306.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091306-300x166.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091306-1024x568.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091306-768x426.jpg 768w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091306.jpg\"><\/p>\n<p>HIPify is a set of open-source tools that <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.amd.com\/bundle\/HIPify-Reference-Guide-v5.5\/page\/HIPify.html\" target=\"_blank\">translates CUDA source code into HIP C++ automatically<\/a>! With this translation layer, products and applications with even age-old CUDA code can add support for Radeon graphics cards without a massive undertaking like starting from scratch.<\/p>\n<p>As for the performance impact, AMD claims almost no impact on performance! We\u2019ll check that out in the benchmarks ourselves, though.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Radeon_Support_for_Redshift_is_Finally_Here\"><\/span>Radeon Support for Redshift is Finally Here!<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The HIPify translation layer has allowed Redshift developers to write GPU applications for multiple environments (HIP, CUDA, etc.) using their original CUDA code. As Maxon outlined <a href=\"https:\/\/www.maxon.net\/en\/article\/maxon-announces-redshift-support-for-amd-radeon-pro-graphics-on-windows\" target=\"_blank\">in its blog post<\/a> last year, it is leveraging the HIP translation approach to add Radeon support.<\/p>\n<p>Now, Redshift supports both NVIDIA and AMD Radeon graphics cards on Windows!<\/p>\n<p>If Radeon GPUs can keep up with their NVIDIA price competitors in a variety of workloads, this could be the start of a new era for Pro applications and competition in the workstation GPU space.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Radeon_PRO_W7900_W7800_Redshift_Benchmarks_Whats_the_Verdict\"><\/span>Radeon PRO W7900 &amp; W7800 Redshift Benchmarks: What\u2019s the Verdict?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>It feels strange to be testing Radeon cards on the one render engine that never featured support for AMD on Windows in the first place. Let\u2019s see how they fare!<\/p>\n<p>Both the Radeon PRO W7900 and W7800 perform \u2018okay\u2019 \u2013 considering their price.<\/p>\n<p><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"img-with-border alignnone wp-image-22651 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Redshift-Benchmark-3.5.15.png\" alt=\"Redshift Benchmark 3.5.15\" width=\"800\" height=\"490\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Redshift-Benchmark-3.5.15.png 800w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Redshift-Benchmark-3.5.15-300x184.png 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Redshift-Benchmark-3.5.15-768x470.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\"><\/noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"img-with-border alignnone wp-image-22651 size-full lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%20800%20490%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"Redshift Benchmark 3.5.15\" width=\"800\" height=\"490\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%20800%20490%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 800w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Redshift-Benchmark-3.5.15.png 800w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Redshift-Benchmark-3.5.15-300x184.png 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Redshift-Benchmark-3.5.15-768x470.png 768w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Redshift-Benchmark-3.5.15.png\"><\/p>\n<p>The GeForce RTX 4080 obliterates the brand-new Radeon Pro W7900 and W7800 by cutting render times in half and less than half, respectively. The top-tier RTX 6000 Ada does walk all over the competition, but also costs double.<\/p>\n<p>As expected, the Radeon RX 7900XTX edges out the Radeon Pro W7900 by a slim margin \u2013 making it a decent option for those who want a lower price point at the cost of VRAM, workstation drivers, and workstation GPU support.<\/p>\n<p>But sadly, none of the AMD Radeon parts come close to beating NVIDIA\u2019s current offerings in Redshift. Even NVIDIA\u2019s RTX A6000, which launched back in December 2020, comes out on top \u2013 beating the Radeon PRO W7900 easily.<\/p>\n<p><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22660\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090837.jpg\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"915\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090837.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090837-300x214.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090837-1024x732.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090837-768x549.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"><\/noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22660 lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%20915%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"915\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%20915%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090837.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090837-300x214.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090837-1024x732.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090837-768x549.jpg 768w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_090837.jpg\"><\/p>\n<p>Redshift has stated that AMD\u2019s Ray Tracing hardware isn\u2019t being used optimally \u2018yet.\u2019 This is probably a result of HIPify catering to CUDA translation, and not helping so much when it comes to NVIDIA\u2019s OptiX framework for RT.<\/p>\n<p>Hopefully, things will improve? But since we can\u2019t really assess what sort of improvement there will be or if there will be any at all, I\u2019d recommend shopping based on the chart above for now. As of now, AMD's performance in Redshift sits somewhere near an RTX 3080.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Radeon_Blender_GPU_Benchmark_OptiX_vs_HIP\"><\/span>Radeon Blender GPU Benchmark: OptiX vs. HIP<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Saying Blender\u2019s OptiX implementation is done well would be like calling the Great Wall of China a good fence. So, if AMD's RT hardware isn't being used optimally yet, it really has no chance at competing with NVIDIA in this particular workload.<\/p>\n<p><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"img-with-border alignnone wp-image-22652 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Blender-GPU-Benchmark-3.5.0.png\" alt=\"Blender GPU Benchmark 3.5.0\" width=\"800\" height=\"501\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Blender-GPU-Benchmark-3.5.0.png 800w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Blender-GPU-Benchmark-3.5.0-300x188.png 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Blender-GPU-Benchmark-3.5.0-768x481.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\"><\/noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"img-with-border alignnone wp-image-22652 size-full lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%20800%20501%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"Blender GPU Benchmark 3.5.0\" width=\"800\" height=\"501\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%20800%20501%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 800w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Blender-GPU-Benchmark-3.5.0.png 800w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Blender-GPU-Benchmark-3.5.0-300x188.png 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Blender-GPU-Benchmark-3.5.0-768x481.png 768w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/Blender-GPU-Benchmark-3.5.0.png\"><\/p>\n<p>The results aren\u2019t too much of a surprise.<\/p>\n<p>Using OptiX on Blender is pretty much a cheat code for NVIDIA GPUs.<\/p>\n<p>AMD\u2019s offerings flounder in the distance \u2013 easily getting wrecked by even the 2\u20133-year-old NVIDIA RTX A6000 (I detest NVIDIA's workstation GPU naming scheme\u2026).<\/p>\n<p>As for top-tier products like RTX 4090 and RTX 6000 Ada, they\u2019re just in a league of their own, competing amongst themselves.<\/p>\n<p>If you\u2019re using Blender, I\u2019d still stick to NVIDIA until things improve on the AMD side.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Radeon_Pro_Adobe_After_Effects_and_Premiere_Pro_Benchmarks\"><\/span>Radeon Pro Adobe After Effects and Premiere Pro Benchmarks<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Adobe\u2019s suite of applications has always heavily favored NVIDIA, and unfortunately, the trend doesn\u2019t seem to have shifted even now.<\/p>\n<p><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"img-with-border alignnone wp-image-22653 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-Premiere-Pro-V0.95.6.png\" alt=\"PugetBench for Premiere Pro V0.95.6\" width=\"800\" height=\"501\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-Premiere-Pro-V0.95.6.png 800w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-Premiere-Pro-V0.95.6-300x188.png 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-Premiere-Pro-V0.95.6-768x481.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\"><\/noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"img-with-border alignnone wp-image-22653 size-full lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%20800%20501%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"PugetBench for Premiere Pro V0.95.6\" width=\"800\" height=\"501\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%20800%20501%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 800w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-Premiere-Pro-V0.95.6.png 800w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-Premiere-Pro-V0.95.6-300x188.png 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-Premiere-Pro-V0.95.6-768x481.png 768w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-Premiere-Pro-V0.95.6.png\"> <noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"img-with-border alignnone wp-image-22654 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-After-Effects-V0.95.2.png\" alt=\"PugetBench for After Effects V0.95.2\" width=\"800\" height=\"501\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-After-Effects-V0.95.2.png 800w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-After-Effects-V0.95.2-300x188.png 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-After-Effects-V0.95.2-768x481.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\"><\/noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"img-with-border alignnone wp-image-22654 size-full lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%20800%20501%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"PugetBench for After Effects V0.95.2\" width=\"800\" height=\"501\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%20800%20501%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 800w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-After-Effects-V0.95.2.png 800w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-After-Effects-V0.95.2-300x188.png 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-After-Effects-V0.95.2-768x481.png 768w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/PugetBench-for-After-Effects-V0.95.2.png\"><\/p>\n<p>When you account for the price, the performance on PugetBench isn\u2019t <strong>too <\/strong>shabby. For example, you have to spend double the money to gain 20% additional performance when moving from the Radeon PRO W7900 to NVIDIA\u2019s top-tier workstation GPU \u2013 the RTX 6000 Ada (again\u2026the names).<\/p>\n<p>If the Adobe suite is part of your workflow, <strong>and you need a workstation GPU<\/strong> for other applications like Solidworks, these Radeon PRO GPUs are a solid choice. However, <strong>if a mainstream GPU will do the job, I\u2019d just grab an RTX 4080<\/strong> instead of considering AMD\u2019s Radeon RX 7900XTX.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Time_to_Seriously_Consider_AMD_Radeon_for_Workstations\"><\/span>Time to Seriously Consider AMD Radeon for Workstations?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>It doesn\u2019t look like we can ignore AMD\u2019s workstation GPUs in a professional workflow anymore as the apps we\u2019ve benched above are the ones Alex uses as part of his CG workflow (in addition to C4D). All the apps held up well and we didn\u2019t encounter any instability or crashes during our testing.<\/p>\n<p>If your workload doesn't involve heavy use of Blender, these new Radeon GPUs are a solid choice. But if you do primarily work on Blender, just pay the NVIDIA tax and grab an RTX card (until things improve).<\/p>\n<p><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22661\" src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353.jpg\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"721\" srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-1024x577.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-768x433.jpg 768w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-1200x675.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-825x464.jpg 825w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-594x335.jpg 594w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-420x236.jpg 420w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"><\/noscript><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-22661 lazyload\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%20721%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E\" alt=\"AMD Radeon Pro W7900 W7800 Review\" width=\"1280\" height=\"721\" srcset=\"data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20viewBox%3D%220%200%201280%20721%22%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-1024x577.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-768x433.jpg 768w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-1200x675.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-825x464.jpg 825w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-594x335.jpg 594w, https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353-420x236.jpg 420w\" data-src=\"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/media\/2023\/05\/20230526_091353.jpg\"><\/p>\n<p>HIPify, at least, has allowed Radeon GPUs to compete with their NVIDIA counterparts, even if performance isn\u2019t there yet. I would say this launch and the slow rollout of support for Radeon graphics cards bodes well for the workstation market.<\/p>\n<p>Still, any of us who\u2019ve worked on large projects know that a rock-solid workstation is worth its weight in gold.<\/p>\n<p><strong>With just a few days to assess these Radeon PRO GPUs, it\u2019s impossible for us to get a better feel for these GPUs in a professional setting. So, as an experiment, Alex will be switching to the Radeon PRO W7900 Graphics card on his primary workstation (it replaces an RTX 4080) for a month.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ll be posting more details about AMD\u2019s new Radeon PRO lineup and how HIP-translated apps hold up in more demanding, real-world scenes rather than relatively light benchmark scenes, sometime next month.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Verdict\"><\/span>Verdict?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>For now, the Radeon PRO W7900 and W7800 undercut NVIDIA by a decent margin while also expanding Radeon's support in popular professional applications. But it also lags behind the products that it undercuts. That's an <em>okay<\/em> product in my book.<\/p>\n<p>Support is a good-enough first step.<\/p>\n<p>If AMD can deliver excellent price-to-performance in subsequent generations, it has the workstation market in the bag.<\/p>\n<p><strong>At the moment however, Nvidia still reigns supreme, and a discounted RTX A6000 would be the far superior choice<\/strong>. Although I'm pretty sure the Radeon PRO W7900 will come down in price quickly, I can't help but feel that AMD missed an opportunity here. If they had priced their parts at $3500 and $2000, it would have been a very easy recommendation.<\/p>\n<p>As it stands, I would consider the Radeon PRO W7900 and W7800 <em>&#8216;okay'<\/em> products. Nothing's too exciting about them. They don't move the current market's price-to-performance chart at all, and don't offer anywhere close to class-leading performance.<\/p>\n<p><strong>However, what's exciting is the expanding support for Radeon GPUs in apps that have always been NVIDIA-only. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>So, what do you think? How do you feel about this launch? Let us know in the comments!<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Every GPU review we\u2019ve done over the past few years for workstation use has always been accompanied by a sickening sidenote \u2013 NVIDIA offers better support for Pro apps. Well, is this finally the one where we, for once, DON\u2019T have to say it? I certainly hope so. Introducing the AMD Radeon PRO W7900 and...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2334,"featured_media":22644,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[74,193],"tags":[116,118],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22642"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2334"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22642"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22642\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22673,"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22642\/revisions\/22673"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22642"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22642"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/g100.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22642"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}