<\/span><\/h2>\nWhen it comes to powerful 3D workloads, Blender is one of the first things that comes to mind because it\u2019s so accessible to everyone.<\/p>\n
Unfortunately, thanks to the vast emptiness that is the GPU market right now, even beginners have nowhere to turn!<\/p>\n
It\u2019s almost impossible to grab a competent graphics card to get started without being forced to spend an arm and leg.<\/p>\n
Is the Radeon Pro W6400 going to be the savior we all need? No. Not really.<\/p>\n
It works. It works well<\/strong> if you account for how low its power draw is.<\/p>\nBut that\u2019s about it. There\u2019s nothing particularly exciting or remarkable about this graphics card in Blender.<\/p>\n
<\/noscript> <\/p>\nIt matches its similarly-priced Nvidia workstation competitor \u2013 the Nvidia (Quadro) T600.<\/p>\n
Although this doesn\u2019t seem too bad a result, we also have no choice but to account for the fact that CUDA compatibility with professional apps is far superior, making Nvidia the better choice.<\/p>\n
If you bring gaming graphics cards into the equation, the $400~ RTX 3050 seems like a much sweeter deal.<\/p>\n
It\u2019ll bring down the time to complete the BMW render to just 76 seconds!<\/p>\n
But, yes, it does use much more power to give you this performance, and you lose out on workstation features (if you need any) and drivers.<\/p>\n
Recommendation: <\/strong>If you need an entry-level workstation GPU for Blender, pick the Nvidia T600 over the AMD Radeon Pro W6400.<\/p>\nIf gaming graphics are an option, the RTX 3050 offers far better value than either of these options.<\/p>\n
<\/span>Adobe Photoshop<\/span><\/h2>\nPhotoshop rarely needs too powerful a GPU to get the job done.<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s Puget System\u2019s benchmark for Adobe Photoshop run on the Radeon Pro W6400 and the Nvidia T1000 and T600.<\/p>\n
<\/noscript>Source: PugetSystems<\/p><\/div>\n
As you can see from the numbers, performance with these graphics cards is close.<\/p>\n
However, if you\u2019re using a bunch of GPU-intensive third-party plugins, this benchmark might not be very relevant to your workflow.<\/p>\n
Any of these graphics cards will do fine for most Photoshop users.<\/p>\n
If Photoshop is your only professional workload and you cannot find decent GPUs at your budget, both the Radeon Pro W6400 and the Nvidia T600 offer a reasonable starting point.<\/p>\n
On somewhat of a side note, here\u2019s what AMD\u2019s official numbers look like \u2013<\/p>\n
<\/noscript>Source: PugetSystems<\/p><\/div>\n
At first glance, you\u2019d think there was a significant performance difference between AMD\u2019s and Nvidia\u2019s offerings.<\/p>\n
However, the scale picked for this graph is laughable at best and malicious at worst.<\/p>\n
C\u2019mon guys.<\/p>\n
Recommendation: <\/strong>If you need an entry-level workstation GPU for Photoshop, the Radeon Pro W6400 and the Nvidia T600 are both decent options.<\/p>\nBuy whatever\u2019s cheaper.<\/p>\n
<\/span>SpecViewPerf13: Solidworks, Autodesk Maya, and Autodesk 3dsMax<\/span><\/h2>\nAlthough AMD stresses time and again that the Radeon Pro W6400 isn\u2019t meant for any complex 3D workloads, beginners and students might still find it an attractive proposition if there\u2019s nothing else available.<\/p>\n
As you can see from the performance graph for Maya, the Radeon Pro W6400 performs half as well as Nvidia\u2019s Quadro RTX 4000, which is a \u2018$950\u2019 graphics card.<\/p>\n
I\u2019ve put quotes around that price because it\u2019s near-impossible to find at MSRP.<\/p>\n
The lowest I\u2019ve seen a Quadro RTX 4000 is $1000, while most of them sell for close to $1200.<\/p>\n
Unfortunately, we don\u2019t have any numbers for Nvidia\u2019s current-gen workstation graphics cards like the T600 and T1000.<\/p>\n
But I\u2019d wager their performance won\u2019t be too far off from where the Radeon Pro W6400 sits.<\/p>\n
All in all, I\u2019d give it an \u2013 it\u2019s not terrible.<\/p>\n
Gaming graphics cards like an RTX 3060 will offer much better value (if you can miraculously find one near MSRP).<\/p>\n